If you’re currently using Maze to run usability tests, validate ideas, and gather product insights, you probably value its simple setup and prototype testing features. But maybe you’ve hit some friction, like limited customization, no built-in task management, or the need to jump between tools for feedback and follow-up. Or maybe you’re just looking for something more flexible and affordable.
Either way, it’s worth exploring other options. Here are five great Maze alternatives that might be a better fit for how your team works.
Quick Glance: Top 5 Alternatives to Maze
- Evrybo: Best all in one design feedback, usability testing, and task management with generous free plan and afforable pricing.
- Lyssna: Quick visual feedback with five-second and preference tests
- UserTesting: Enterprise-grade live user testing and insights
- Useberry: Unmoderated Figma prototype testing with heatmaps
- PlaybookUX: Full-service UX research with participant recruitment
What is Maze?
Maze is a remote user testing platform that allows teams to test prototypes, run surveys, and gather user feedback. It’s especially popular with product designers who use Figma, Adobe XD, or Sketch.
Maze offers a mix of unmoderated usability testing, feedback forms, and analytics. While it’s designed to be simple and fast, some teams feel it’s too rigid or limited for their workflows.
Maze Pricing (as of 2025):
- Free plan with limited responses and questons
- Starter: $99/month
- Organization: Custom pricing for larger teams
Where Maze Might Fall Short
While Maze works well for quick prototype testing, it may not be ideal for every team. Here are some reasons people look for alternatives:
- Limited collaboration tools (no task tracking or client feedback system)
- Can be pricey for growing teams with moderate usage
- Limited customization for surveys and forms
1. Evrybo
For teams who want feedback, testing, and project tracking in one place
Evrybo is built for teams who want more than just usability testing. With features like Surveys, To-Do Boards, and Bug Tracking, you can go from collecting user feedback to shipping better designs, all in one tool.
It’s especially useful if you work with clients or stakeholders outside your company. You can share links for quick feedback, assign tasks, and keep everyone in sync without juggling multiple tools.
Key Features:
- Create usability tests and clickable prototypes
- Collect user feedback via forms and comment pins
- Manage design tasks with Kanban-style To-Do boards
- Invite external guests for reviews without sign-ups
What makes Evrybo different (vs. Maze)?
Unlike Maze, which focuses solely on usability testing, Evrybo brings together testing, feedback, and task management in one simple platform. You can collect user insights, assign follow-up tasks, and track project progress—all without switching tools.
Evrybo’s free plan lets you fully customize the welcome, thank you screens, collect unlimited responses, and access all styling options.
Pricing:
Free plan includes one form with unlimited questions and submissions
Paid plans start at $4/month per user
2.Lyssna (formerly UsabilityHub)
Fast, lightweight user feedback with first-click and five-second tests.
Key features:
- First-click and five-second tests
- Preference tests
- Surveys and question logic
- Large participant panel
What makes Lyssna different (vs. Maze)?
It’s designed for quick feedback cycles rather than full usability testing flows.
Things to consider:
Limited with number of questions, you need to by additional points, no style custmizationd allowed.
Pricing:
Free plan available limited responses and questons
Paid plans start at $75/month
3. UserTesting
Enterprise-level platform with live sessions, screen recordings, and advanced targeting.
Key features:
- Moderated and unmoderated tests
- Advanced participant targeting
- Live conversation tools
- Transcripts and sentiment analysis
What makes UserTesting different (vs. Maze)?
UserTesting goes far beyond Maze in terms of scale, audience reach, and research capabilities. It’s built for teams with large research budgets.
Things to consider:
Overkill for small teams and has a steeper learning curve.
Pricing:
Custom pricing only
Generally expensive (starts around $30k/year)
4. Useberry
Test Figma prototypes with real users and get analytics like heatmaps and completion paths.
Key features:
- Direct integration with Figma
- Task completion paths and heatmaps
- Video and screen recordings
- Unmoderated testing and surveys
What makes Useberry different (vs. Maze)?
Useberry puts analytics front and center. Compared to Maze, it offers deeper behavioral insights like where users clicked, dropped off, or hesitated.
Things to consider:
Some users report that setup can feel a bit technical at first.
Pricing:
Free trial available limited to only 10 responses/month
Plans start at $67/month
5. PlaybookUX
Short description:
All-in-one UX research tool with moderated and unmoderated testing options.
Key features:
- Moderated interviews and surveys
- Automatic transcription
- Screener questions and participant recruitment
- UX repository for storing sessions
What makes PlaybookUX different (vs. Maze)?
PlaybookUX supports live interviews in addition to remote testing. If your team does in-depth qualitative research, this tool gives you more options than Maze.
Things to consider:
More research-focused than design workflow-focused.
Pricing:
Starts at $5,400/billed annually
Pay-as-you-go available for participant testing
Wrapping Up
Maze is a solid choice for unmoderated usability testing, especially for teams working with prototypes. But its limitations, like lack of project management, limited collaboration tools, and higher pricing, might leave some teams looking for more flexibility.
Evrybo stands out as a leading alternative, offering an all-in-one space for usability testing, feedback collection, and task tracking. Its free plan includes unlimited responses, full customization, and seamless guest access, making it a smart pick for design teams who want to test, collaborate, and take action in one place.
👉 Try Evrybo for Free and start testing, and collecting feedback with less friction.